Individual Presentation or Panel Title
‘Para que nunca más seamos excluidos’?: Contradictions in the Rhetoric of Indigeneity and the Political Reality of the Bolivian Morales Administration
Abstract
Since his party’s rise to power, the rhetoric of Bolivian president Evo Morales has been noted for its exaltation and inclusion of the overwhelmingly indigenous population of Bolivia. Despite the predominantly indigenous demographic of the nation, this remains a notable occurrence bearing in mind the unprecedented fact that Morales himself is indigenous. Thus, in a nation where recognizing identity is so vital to understanding a population, the significant lack of indigenous political representation before Morales’ election makes the stakes of Morales’ presidency that much higher. To many of his indigenous compatriots, Morales seems to be the individual to bring about a long-awaited indigenous-led revolution. Yet while his rhetoric compellingly suggests the nation is working toward such a revolution, Morales’ political actions seem incongruent with that language. Through an analysis informed by critical pedagogy studies, this thesis project examines Morales’ strategically inclusionary language, notably a narrative of the historical exploitation of the indigenous, as a means to gain political clout, while also assessing his policy-based shortcomings and the ensuing effects of aporia.
Location
Goodwin Private Dining Room
Start Date
30-4-2016 2:30 PM
End Date
30-4-2016 3:20 PM
Keywords
Bolivia, rhetoric, Morales, critical pedagogy, indigeneity
‘Para que nunca más seamos excluidos’?: Contradictions in the Rhetoric of Indigeneity and the Political Reality of the Bolivian Morales Administration
Goodwin Private Dining Room
Since his party’s rise to power, the rhetoric of Bolivian president Evo Morales has been noted for its exaltation and inclusion of the overwhelmingly indigenous population of Bolivia. Despite the predominantly indigenous demographic of the nation, this remains a notable occurrence bearing in mind the unprecedented fact that Morales himself is indigenous. Thus, in a nation where recognizing identity is so vital to understanding a population, the significant lack of indigenous political representation before Morales’ election makes the stakes of Morales’ presidency that much higher. To many of his indigenous compatriots, Morales seems to be the individual to bring about a long-awaited indigenous-led revolution. Yet while his rhetoric compellingly suggests the nation is working toward such a revolution, Morales’ political actions seem incongruent with that language. Through an analysis informed by critical pedagogy studies, this thesis project examines Morales’ strategically inclusionary language, notably a narrative of the historical exploitation of the indigenous, as a means to gain political clout, while also assessing his policy-based shortcomings and the ensuing effects of aporia.