Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and American Idol

Presenter Information

Event Type

Research Presentation

Academic Department

Mathematics and Statistics

Location

Dana Science Building, 2nd floor

Start Date

24-4-2026 1:00 PM

End Date

24-4-2026 2:30 PM

Description

This paper explores both the mathematical foundations and real-world applications of voting theory by examining the proof of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and its relevance to modern systems such as American Idol. The first part of this study provides a detailed explanation of Arrow's Theorem, including the formal definitions of key fairness criteria: Non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA), and unrestricted domain. Building on this, I then apply these concepts to the voting structure used in American Idol, which primarily follows a plurality voting system. By analyzing how audience voting determines winners, the study investigates whether the system satisfies Arrow's fairness criteria and identifies the ways in which it falls short, particularly through violations of independence of irrelevant alternatives.

Comments

Under the direction of Dr. Molly Weselcouch.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 1:00 PM Apr 24th, 2:30 PM

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and American Idol

Dana Science Building, 2nd floor

This paper explores both the mathematical foundations and real-world applications of voting theory by examining the proof of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and its relevance to modern systems such as American Idol. The first part of this study provides a detailed explanation of Arrow's Theorem, including the formal definitions of key fairness criteria: Non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA), and unrestricted domain. Building on this, I then apply these concepts to the voting structure used in American Idol, which primarily follows a plurality voting system. By analyzing how audience voting determines winners, the study investigates whether the system satisfies Arrow's fairness criteria and identifies the ways in which it falls short, particularly through violations of independence of irrelevant alternatives.