Individual Presentation or Panel Title

Sustainability, eh? An Analysis of Vancouver, British Columbia’s 2020 Greenest City Action Plan

Abstract

The concept of urban sustainability is at once apparent and ambiguous in its objectives and implementation. In this paper, I analyze Vancouver, British Columbia’s 2020 Greenest City Action Plan (GCAP), a 10-part plan designed with the objective of making Vancouver the “world’s greenest city by 2020.” I argue that the integration of sustainability discourses into urban planning through documents such as the 2020 GCAP emphasizes false understandings of urban and natural space as divisible and autonomous. In failing to produce a clear definition of sustainability, planning regimes like the City of Vancouver have coopted the concept as master-signifier in urban planning discourse, creating an ethos of environmentalism within urban space built upon artificial consensus concerning what it means to be “green.” Using Foucauldian discourse analysis, I read the 2020 GCAP for a definition of sustainability and conclude that in lacking a definition of this concept, the GCAP itself becomes a definition of sustainability. Thus, sustainability becomes a mechanism of governmentality, limiting the type of environmental action that can be taken within cities, and emphasizing power struggles inscribed within and beyond urban spaces.

Presenter Information

Mikaela Murphy, Hollins University

Location

Janney Lounge

Start Date

30-4-2016 3:30 PM

End Date

30-4-2016 4:20 PM

Keywords

urban planning, sustainability, governmentality, socionatural production

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 30th, 3:30 PM Apr 30th, 4:20 PM

Sustainability, eh? An Analysis of Vancouver, British Columbia’s 2020 Greenest City Action Plan

Janney Lounge

The concept of urban sustainability is at once apparent and ambiguous in its objectives and implementation. In this paper, I analyze Vancouver, British Columbia’s 2020 Greenest City Action Plan (GCAP), a 10-part plan designed with the objective of making Vancouver the “world’s greenest city by 2020.” I argue that the integration of sustainability discourses into urban planning through documents such as the 2020 GCAP emphasizes false understandings of urban and natural space as divisible and autonomous. In failing to produce a clear definition of sustainability, planning regimes like the City of Vancouver have coopted the concept as master-signifier in urban planning discourse, creating an ethos of environmentalism within urban space built upon artificial consensus concerning what it means to be “green.” Using Foucauldian discourse analysis, I read the 2020 GCAP for a definition of sustainability and conclude that in lacking a definition of this concept, the GCAP itself becomes a definition of sustainability. Thus, sustainability becomes a mechanism of governmentality, limiting the type of environmental action that can be taken within cities, and emphasizing power struggles inscribed within and beyond urban spaces.